When a POSH inquiry is appealed, a judge or appellate authority doesn’t relive the hearings. They read the file.
And they read it looking for specific procedural points.
What do Courts examining POSH appeals routinely scrutinize- Process, outcome or recommendations?
What is given more weightage to?
This session will give you the opportunity to connect with Adv. Sana Hakim (She /Her) who has experience as a co-founding partner of Equilibrio Advisory LLP which supports organisations with end–to–end compliance with POSH and also appears in Courts in POSH appeal matters.
More details | Past Events | Support
Duration: 1.5 hours
Format: Interactive working session (case-based discussion)
Who Should Attend: Leadership, Independent POSH Practitioners, HR professionals, IC Presiding Officers, IC members, External Members
Facilitated by: Adv. Sana Hakim (She/Her) – Co-founder and Partner at Equilibrio Advisory LLP, Advocate (High Court, Bombay), External Member & Trainer (POSH, POCSO, DEIB, MH)
Date & Time: 18th July 2026 | 11:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.
Virtual: Microsoft teams
Most IC members are confident running an inquiry. Almost none are confident about what happens once it’s appealed.
This gap shows up as a liability, not just a knowledge gap, procedural mistakes that get exploited, findings that can’t be defended, and organisations facing writ petitions they never saw coming.
This session is for people who are already in the room when these complaints happen:
This is not an introductory POSH session. It assumes familiarity with the complaint and inquiry process and goes deep on the stage that usually gets skipped.